Performance Investigation of DP-16QAM Ultra-wideband- Wavelength-Division Multiplexing Communication System: Optimum Power Consideration

Authors

  • Arwa Moosa Ph.D. student in Al-Nahrain University and Lecturer in Al-Iraqia University
  • Raad Sami Fyath

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29194/NJES.26010037

Keywords:

S C L WDM, Dual-polarization 16-QAM system, Stimulated Raman scattering, UWB-WDM system

Abstract

Recently, there is increasing interest in using the 18 THz bandwidth offered by S+C+L band to increase the transmission capacity of fiber communication systems. This leads to the generation of ultra-wideband (UWB) wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) optical communication systems. In these advanced systems, stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) causes a power transfer from high-frequency channels to low-frequency channels. This effect leads to an increase in the nonlinear interference (NLI) between the UWB-WDM channels. Power optimization techniques are required to balance transfer power between band channels, thus increasing the maximum transmission reach (MTR) along with increasing system capacity. In this paper, the transmission performance of S+C+L band system operating with dual-polarization 16-QAM signaling is investigated using enhanced Gaussian noise model. The transmitter and receiver for each DP channel use a -polarized laser and incorporate two identical configurations, one for x- and the other for y-state of polarization (SOP). The results are presented for two values of symbol rate, 40 and 80 GBaud, where the system carries 360 (=160+80+120) and 180 (=80+40+60) channels, respectively. The results revel that the MTR of both cases is equal to 12 100 km-spans when the channel lunch power equals to -4 and -2 dBm, respectively. This work also shows the effect of NLI components as a function of the number of spans, channel spacing, and channel launch power. The results show that the cross-phase modulation component of the NLI has high accumulated value with transmission distance, while the self-phase modulation component is almost constant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

H. F. Benjamin J. Puttnam, Ruben S. Luís, Georg Rademacher, Yoshinari Awaji, “Investigation of Long-Haul S- , C- + L-Band Transmission,” in 2022 Optical Fiber Communication (OFC) Conference, 2022, pp. 1–3.

C. R. Kobayashi, Takayuki, Cho, Junho, Lamponi, Marco, De Valicourt, Guilhem, Doerr, “Coherent Optical Transceivers Scaling and Integration Challenges,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 1679–1698, 2022, doi: 10.1109/jproc.2022.3206268.

D. Semrau, “Modeling of Fiber Nonlinearity in Wideband Transmission,” in 2022 Optical Fiber Communication (OFC) Conference, Optica Publishing, 2022, pp. 6–8. doi: 10.1364/ofc.2022.w3c.6.

X. Ming, Hao, Chen, Xinyu, Fang and F. Zhang, Lei, Li, Chenjia, Zhang, “Ultralow Complexity Long Short-Term Memory Network for Fiber Nonlinearity Mitigation in Coherent Optical Communication Systems,” J Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 2427–2434, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2022.3141404.

G. C. Salma Escobar Landero, Ivan Fernandez de Jauregui Ruiz, Alessio Ferrari, Dylan Le Gac, Yann Frignac, “Link Power Optimization for S+C+L Multi-band WDM Coherent Transmission Systems,” in 2022 Optical Fiber Communication (OFC) Conference, Optica Publishing, 2022, pp. 1–3. doi: 10.1364/ofc.2022.w4i.5.

S. de Koster, Pascal, Koch, Jonas, Schulz, Olaf, Pachnicke, Stephan, and Wahls, “Experimental Validation of Nonlinear Fourier Transform-Based Kerr-Nonlinearity Identification Over A 1600 Km SSMF Link,” in 2022 Optical Fiber Communication (OFC) Conference, 2022, pp. 1–3. doi: 10.1364/ofc.2022.w2a.39.

H. Rabbani, H. Hosseinianfar, H. Rabbani, and M. Brandt-Pearce, “Analysis of Nonlinear Fiber Kerr Effects for Arbitrary Modulation Formats,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 96–104, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2022.3213182.

L. R. Amirabadi, Mohammad Ali, Kahaei, Mohammad Hossein, Nezamalhosseini, and S. Alireza, Chen, “Optimal Power Allocation In Nonlinear MDM-WDM Systems Using Gaussian Noise Model,” IET Optoelectronics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 133–148, 2022, doi: 10.1049/ote2.12064.

J. Zhang, Chengliang, Liu, Xiang, Li and J. Zhang, Anxu, Liu, Hao, Feng, Lipeng, Lv, Kai, Liao, Shenghui, Chang, Zeshan, Zhang, “Optical Layer Impairments and Their Mitigation in C+L+S+E+O Multi-Band Optical Networks With G.652 and Loss-Minimized G.654 Fibers,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 3415–3424, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2022.3166652.

A. Soleimanzade and M. Ardakani, “EGN-Based Optimization of the APSK Constellations for the Non-Linear Fiber Channel Based on the Symbol-Wise Mutual Information,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1937–1952, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2021.3132863.

A. J. Lowery and L. B. Y. Du, “XPM Efficiency Versus Symbol Rate,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 2850–2861, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2022.3148414.

H. Rabbani, H. Hossienianfar, and M. Brandt-Pearce, “An Enhanced Analytical Model of Nonlinear Fiber Effects for Four-Dimensional Symmetric Modulation Formats,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 40, no. 16, pp. 5567–5574, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2022.3183162.

M. F. Mikhailov, Vitaly, Luo, Jiawei, Inniss, Daryl, Yan and D. J. Sun, Yingzhi, Puc, Gabriel S., Windeler, Robert S., Westbrook, Paul S., Dulashko, Yuriy, Digiovanni, “Amplified Transmission Beyond C- and L- Bands: Bismuth Doped Fiber Amplifier for O-Band Transmission,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 3255–3262, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2022.3169172.

L. Rapp and M. Eiselt, “Optical Amplifiers for Multi-Band Optical Transmission Systems,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1579–1589, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2021.3120944.

T. Liu, Zheng, Xu, Tianhua, Jin, Cenqin, Xu, Tongyang, Tan, Mingming, Zhao, Jian, Liu, “Analytical Optimization of Wideband Nonlinear Optical Fiber Communication Systems,” Optics Express, vol. 30, no. 7, p. 11345, 2022, doi: 10.1364/oe.453307.

D. W. Roberts, Ian, Kahn, Joseph M., Harley, JamesmBoertjes, “Channel Power Optimization of WDM Systems Following Gaussian Noise Nonlinearity Model in Presence of Stimulated Raman Scattering,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 35, no. 23, pp. 5237–5249, 2017, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2017.2771719.

H. Buglia, E. Sillekens, A. Vasylchenkova, P. Bayvel, and L. Galdino, “On The Impact of Launch Power Optimization And Transceiver Noise on The Performance of Ultra-Wideband Transmission Systems [Invited],” Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. B11–B21, 2022, doi: 10.1364/JOCN.450726.

V. Correia, Bruno, Sadeghi, Rasoul, Virgillito, Emanuele, Napoli, Antonio, Costa, Nelson, Pedro, Joao, Curri, “Networking Performance of Power Optimized C+L+S Multiband Transmission,” in 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2020 - Proceedings, 2020, pp. 2–7. doi: 10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9322068.

D. Uzunidis, C. Matrakidis, E. Kosmatos, A. Stavdas, and A. Lord, “On The Benefits of Power Optimization in The S, C and L-Band Optical Transmission Systems,” Computer Networks, vol. 211, p. 108958, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2022.108958.

H. Luo, J. Lu, Z. Huang, C. Yu, and C. Lu, “Optimization Strategy of Power Control For C+L+S Band Transmission Using A Simulated Annealing Algorithm,” Optics Express, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 664, 2022, doi: 10.1364/oe.439635.

G. P. Agrawal, "Fiber-Optic Communication Systems". Wiley, 5th Edition, 2021.

S. Okamoto et al., “A Study on the Effect of Ultra-Wide Band WDM on Optical Transmission Systems,” Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1061–1070, 2020, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2019.2962178.

G. P. Agrawal, "Fiberoptic communication systems", 2021. doi: 10.1080/09500349314550971.

A. Souza, N. Costa, J. Pedro, and J. Pires, “Benefits of Counterpropagating Raman Amplification for Multiband Optical Networks,” Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 562, 2022, doi: 10.1364/jocn.456582.

D. Semrau, E. Sillekens, P. Bayvel, and R. I. Killey, “Modeling and Mitigation of Fiber Nonlinearity in Wideband Optical Signal Transmission [Invited],” Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. C68–C76, 2020, doi: 10.1364/JOCN.382267.

P. Poggiolini, “The GN Model Of Non-Linear Propagation in Uncompensated Coherent Optical Systems,” Journal of Lightwave Technology,, vol. 30, no. 24, pp. 3857–3879, 2012, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2012.2217729.

A. Dissertation, “Development and Design a Compensation Method for Fiber Impairment in Ultra-High Speed Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing ( DWDM ) Transmission System Based on Artificial Neural Network”, PhD Thesis, University of Babylon, 2021.

H. K. Chan, David W.U., Wu, Xiong, Zhang, Zunyue, Lu, Chao Lau, Alan Pak Tao, Tsang, “Ultra-Wide Free-Spectral-Range Silicon Microring Modulator for High Capacity WDM,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 40, no. 24, pp. 7848–7855, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2022.3208745.

E. Semrau, Daniel, Sillekens and P. Killey, Robert I., Bayvel, “A Modulation Format Correction Formula for the Gaussian Noise Model in the Presence of Inter-Channel Stimulated Raman Scattering,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 37, no. 19, pp. 5122–5131, 2019, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2019.2929461

Downloads

Published

24-03-2023

How to Cite

[1]
A. Moosa and R. S. Fyath, “Performance Investigation of DP-16QAM Ultra-wideband- Wavelength-Division Multiplexing Communication System: Optimum Power Consideration”, NJES, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 37–44, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.29194/NJES.26010037.

Similar Articles

31-40 of 212

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.