The Attributes of Biophilic Design (Educational Buildings Case Study)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29194/NJES.26030167Keywords:
Biophilia, Biophilic Design, Human-Nature Relationship, Biophilic Design Patterns, Biophilic Design AttributesAbstract
Three decades of empirical research have proven that well-being in humans is stimulated by designs that link people to natural elements and landscapes. Environmental psychology research also revealed that these characteristics can lower stress and anxiety while having a positive impact on human productivity. therefore, there were more recent interest from theorists and architects to discover approaches to re-connect the constructed environment with the natural components. One of the most current theories of re-communication and its use in architecture is called "biophilia.". Therefore, the research problem is the lack of knowledge of biophilic architecture and what are the most prominent features affecting the user. the research aims to shed light on the basics of this design theory as well as testing its design patters in the educational environment to find out which attributes are most effective for users in improving productivity and well-being By adopting the quantitative descriptive approach and based on a questionnaire for the purpose of adopting it in design and to aid in the practical application of the Biophilia idea by designers and architects. The research concluded that there are design features that are more important than others for educational buildings, such as (day light, water, air, plants, landscapes, mobility, integrating the parts to create the whole).
Downloads
References
Kay?han, K.S., 2018. Examination of biophilia phenomenon in the context of sustainable architecture. In Proceedings of 3rd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium (ISBS 2017) Volume 1 3 (pp. 80-101). Springer International Publishing.
Kellert, S.R., 2008. Dimensions, elements, and attributes of biophilic design. Biophilic design: the theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life, pp.3-19.
Sanchez, J.A., Ikaga, T. and Sanchez, S.V., 2018. Quantitative improvement in workplace performance through biophilic design: A pilot experiment case study. Energy and Buildings, 177, pp.316-328.
Ryan, C.O. and Browning, W.D., 2020. Biophilic design. Sustainable Built Environments, pp.43-85.
Mazuch, R., 2017. Salutogenic and biophilic design as therapeutic approaches to sustainable architecture. Architectural Design, 87(2), pp.42-47.
Almusaed, A. and Almssad, A., 2006. Biophilic architecture: The concept of healthy sustainable architecture. In PLEA2006-The 23rd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Geneva, Switzerland, 6-8 September 2006 (pp. 383-387). Universite de Geneve.
Joye, Y., 2007. Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: The case of biophilic architecture. Review of general psychology, 11(4), pp.305-328.
Ramzy, N., 2015. Sustainable spaces with psychological values: Historical architecture as reference book for biomimetic models with biophilic qualities. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 9(2), pp.248-267.
Bolten, B. and Barbiero, G., 2020. Biophilic Design: How to enhance physical and psychological health and wellbeing in our built environments. Visions for Sustainability, 13, pp.11-16.
Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I., Daugelaite, A. and Viliunas, G., 2022. Classification of Biophilic Buildings as Sustainable Environments. Buildings, 12(10), p.1542
Dias, B.D., 2015. Beyond sustainability–biophilic and regenerative design in architecture. European Scientific Journal, 11(9), pp.147-158.
Zhong, W., Schröder, T. and Bekkering, J., 2022. Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), pp.114-141.
SEV?NÇ KAYIHAN, K., ÖZÇELIK GÜNEY, S. and Ünal, F.C., 2018. Biophilia as the Main Design Question in Architectural Design Studio Teaching. Megaron, 13(1).
Ryan, C.O., Browning, W.D., Clancy, J.O., Andrews, S.L. and Kallianpurkar, N.B., 2014. Biophilic design patterns: emerging nature-based parameters for health and well-being in the built environment. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 8(2), p.62.
Kellert, S. and Calabrese, E., 2015. The practice of biophilic design. London: Terrapin Bright LLC, 3, pp.21-46.
Ramzy, N.S., 2015. Biophilic qualities of historical architecture: In quest of the timeless terminologies of ‘life’in architectural expression. Sustainable Cities and Society, 15, pp.42-56.
Sofiana, Y., Yulia, Y. and Indahyani, T., 2021, July. Biophilic design as sustainable approach for interior hospice care. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 794, No. 1, p. 012152). IOP Publishing.
Soderlund, J. and Newman, P., 2015. Biophilic architecture: a review of the rationale and outcomes. AIMS environmental science, 2(4), pp.950-969.
King, B.C., 2022. The Biophilia Hypothesis and Mental Health: A Call for Biophilic Design. In Emerging Approaches in Design and New Connections With Nature (pp. 253-265). IGI Global.
Viliunas, G. and Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I., 2022. Shape-finding in biophilic architecture: application of ai-based tool. Architecture and urban planning, 18(1), pp.68-75.
Watchman, M., Demers, C.M. and Potvin, A., 2021. Biophilic school architecture in cold climates. Indoor and Built Environment, 30(5), pp.585-605.
Katuk, D. and Köseo?lu, E., 2022. Biophilic architecture and water: Examining water as a spatial sensory element. IDA: International Design and Art Journal, 4(2), pp.252-270.
Taylor, R.P., Juliani, A.W., Bies, A.J., Boydston, C., Spehar, B. and Sereno, M.E., 2018. The implications of fractal fluency for biophilic architecture. Journal of biourbanism, 6, pp.23-40.
Almusaed, A. and Almssad, A., 2006. Biophilic Architecture: Towards a new potential of healthy architecture, rethinking sustainable construction. In Proceeding of the 12th Rinker International Conference. Sarasota FL USA.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hiyam Siham
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright of their manuscript by submitting the work to this journal, and all open access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0), which permits use for any non-commercial purpose, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
