The Effect of Wind Loading on the Growth of Crack Propagation in Aircraft Wing

Shahad Nashat Subhi; Fathi Al-shamma

doi:10.29194/NJES.28020205

Authors

Shahad Nashat Subhi Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Iraq.
Fathi Al-shamma Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29194/NJES.28020205

Keywords:

Dynamic crack propagation, Computational fluid dynamics, Non-preoperational multi-axial cyclic load, AL7075-T6 alloy, Angle of attack (AOA)

Abstract

Throughout the flight, aircraft wings continuously struggle against various forces: the forward thrust from the engine, the drag pulling them backward, and sudden turbulence from storms. In contrast, these forces are essential for maintaining aircraft stability. With time, the cyclic stresses can result in the formation and propagation of minuscule cracks in the wings. Cracks growing on the aircraft wing surface manufactured from alloy AL7075-T6, have been investigated when subjected to non-preoperational multi-axial cyclic loading. The results have been evaluated using two methods, numerical simulations and theoretical calculation to evaluate dynamic crack propagation crack growth per cycle (da/dN) at angles of attack 5° and 10°. The results showed that the dynamic crack propagation increases with an increase in the crack length. It was found that the values of the dynamic crack propagation rate at the angle of attack 5⁰ are smaller than the values at the angle of attack 10⁰.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. S. T. Yau and N. Recho, “Crack Growth and Fatigue”. Springer, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26604-4

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), “Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge”, FAA-H-8083-25B, Scientific Reports, 2016. DOI: 10.31236/osf.io/8xq7z

J. B. Kodman, B. Singh, and M. Murugaiah, “A comprehensive survey of open-source tools for computational fluid dynamics analyses,” J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci., vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 123–148, 2024. DOI: 10.37934/arfmts.119.2.123148

A. Sedmak, “Fatigue crack growth simulation by extended finite element method: A review of case studies,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1819–1855, 2024. DOI: 10.1111/ffe.14277

S. Kandwal and S. Singh, “Computational fluid dynamic study of fluid flow and aerodynamic forces on an airfoil,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., vol. 1, no. 7, Sep. 2012. DOI: not available

J. R. R. A. Martins, “Aerodynamic design optimization: Challenges and perspectives,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 239, pp. 100–112, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105479

B. C. Mathewa *et al.*, “Computational study for improvement of aerodynamic performance of airfoil by changing various aerodynamic properties,” Workshop on Control and Embedded Systems, 2021.

H. Pandeya, D. Fernandes, A. Khandelwal, and D. Mishrab, “Finite element analysis of fatigue and fracture behavior in idealized airplane wing model with embedded crack under wind load,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 796, Art. no. 012043, 2021. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/796/1/012043

S. M. Shohel, N. Kumara, N. Bihala, and M. Mehtaa, “A comparative study of finite element analysis on cantilever beam with different materials subjected to uniformly distributed load,” NeuroQuantology, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 2230–2236, 2022. DOI: 10.14704/nq.2022.20.9.NQ22956

R. Abdel-Rahman and B. S. Eldin, Engineering Solid Mechanics. CRC Press, 1999.

M. Janssen, J. Zuidema, and R. J. H. Wanhill, Fracture Mechanics, 2nd ed.

F. A. Al-Shamma, “The effect of fatigue on crack propagation in flat plates under buckling, bending and shear,” Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 206–215, 2009.

F. A. Lowenheim, Modern Electroplating, 2nd ed.

D. F. Socie and G. B. Marquis, Multiaxial Fatigue Handbook. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 2000.

F. A. Al-Shamma and O. A. Jassim, “Dynamic crack propagation in nano-composite thin plates under multi-axial cyclic loading,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 8, pp. 4672–4681, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.07.025