Studying the Impact of Soil Stabilization Techniques on Rigid Pavement Joints Across Various Axle Loads

Authors

  • Asma Thamir Ibraheem Department of Civil Engineering, Al-Nahrain University
  • Hassan M. Mahdi M. Alddin Department of Civil Engineering, Al-Nahrain University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29194/NJES.26040351

Keywords:

Subgrade Soil, Soil Stabilization, Soil Strength, Concrete Strength, Rigid Pavement, Dowel Bars

Abstract

Rigid pavement slabs are erected on a prepared subgrade or foundation layer, providing a hard and continuous surface. Transverse joints made of dowel bars connect them, and longitudinal joints made of tie bars join them longitudinally. This study is an investigation of the impact of soil strength and concrete parameters on the effectiveness of dowel bars in rigid pavements. Moreover, three parameters were examined; California Bearing Ratio (CBR), concrete compressive strength and slab thickness. The analysis was conducted using the Ever FE program and focused on several axle configurations applied to the joint. The results indicate inverse association between the pavement slab thickness and the concrete strength, under the assumption of consistent soil strength. Moreover, an assortment of reduced shear forces on the dowel bars is seen when the soil strength values increase. It indicates that soil strength has a greater impact on the shear load of dowel bars compared to the qualities of concrete. Additionally, the type of axles used and the magnitude of soil strength were shown to have a significant effect on the shear load.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B.S. Mark, K. Lev, H. Kyle, Guidelines for Dowel Alignment in Concrete Pavements, TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 637, 2009.

D.G. Zollinger, J. Soares, Performance of Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavements: Volume VII: Summary, WA-RD098-102. Federal Highway Administration, Virginia, 1999.

A.M. Ioannides, D.R. Alexander, M.I. Hammons, et al., Application of artificial neural networks to concrete pavement joint evaluation, Transp. Res. Rec. 1540 (1996) 54–64. https://doi.org/10.3141/1540-08

Zheng-Feng Zhou, Jian-ming Ling, Jie Yuan, et al., Evaluation of load transfer efficiency at joints for rigid airport pavement, J. Tongji Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 38 (6) (2010) 844–849. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-374x.2010.06.01

De-Yun Zhou, Zu-Kang Yao, Analysis of load transfer at joints in concrete pavements, J. Tongji Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 21 (3) (1993) 57–65.

PENG Peng, TIAN Bo, NIU Kaimin, “Study on Working Performance of Dowel Bar with Horizontal Installation Errors”, Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development. 2012, 6(3):33-38. https://doi.org/10.1061/JHTRCQ.0000104

American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA). Design and construction of joints for concrete highways. Skokie, IL: ACPA; 1991. p. 24.

Teller LW, Cashell HD. Performance of doweled joints under repetitive loading. Public Roads 1958; 30:1–24.

S. R. Maitra; K. S. Reddy; and L. S. Ramachandra, “Load Transfer Characteristics of Dowel Bar System in Jointed Concrete Pavement”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, November 2009. doi:10.1061/ASCETE.1943-5436.0000065

Basim H. Al-Humeidawi and Parthasarathi Mandal, “Experimental investigation on the combined effect of dowel misalignment and cyclic wheel loading on dowel bar performance in JPCP”, Engineering Structures 174 (2018) 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.052

Piotr Mackiewicz, “Analysis of stresses in concrete pavement under a dowel according to its diameter and load transfer efficiency”, Can. J. Civ. Eng. 42: 845–853 (2015) dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2014-0110

H. M. Mahdi M. Alddin, and A. T. Ibraheem, “Review of some Geotechnical Aspects on Structural Response of Rigid Pavements,” vol. 71, no. 4, 2022.

Asal Mahmud Hamad, Mahmood Gazey Jassam,” A Comparative Study for the Effect of Some Petroleum Products on the Engineering Properties of Gypseous Soils”, Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences (2022) 29(3): 59-69. http://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.29.3.7

S.S. Batra, “Effects of cationic bitumen emulsion on shear strength parameters of the soil”, Int J Res Eng Technol (IJRET), 2016, 5.9: 156-160.

S. Andavan, B. Maneesh Kumar, “Case study on soil stabilization by using bitumen emulsions – A review”, Materials Today: Material Today: Proceeding https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.121

Khalid Akbar Shah and Dr. Esar Ahmad, “A Study on Alluvial Soil Stabilization using Bitumen Emulsion”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), Vol. 9 Issue 06, June-2020.

Mu, F.; Mack, J.W.; Rodden, R.A. Review of National and State-Level Calibrations of AASHTO Ware Pavement ME Design for New Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2018, 19, 825–831.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1210804

Nasief, G.H.; Whited, G.C.; Loh, W.-Y. Wisconsin Method for Probing Portland Cement Concrete Pavement for Thickness. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2011, 2228, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.3141/2228-12

I. M. Ramadan, Z. S. El-Din Hussein, and O. M. Mohamady, “EFFECT OF SOIL STRENGTHENING ON RIGID PAVEMENT THICKNESS”, Journal Of Al Azhar University Engineering Sector, Vol. 13, No. 46, January 2018, 46-56. DOI: 10.21608/AUEJ.2018.19088

A. Vaitkus, J. Gražulyt, O. Šernas, M. K.ˇcius, and R. Mickeviˇ, “Concrete Modular Pavement Structures with Optimized Thickness Based on Characteristics of High-Performance Concrete Mixtures with Fibers and Silica Fume”, Materials 2021, 14, 3423. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123423

A. T. Ibraheem and H. M. M. M. Alddin, “A Comparative Study of Soil Stabilization Effect and Concrete Strength Development on Rigid Pavement Thickness”, JUBES, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 77–86, Aug. 2023.

ACI 211, 2009. Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete.

ASTM C39. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. 2017

ASTM C469. Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression. 2014.

ASTM C78. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading), 2016.

ASTM D1883. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils. 2007.

ASTM D2216. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass. 2010

ASTM D2974. Standard Test Methods for Moisture, Ash, and Organic Matter of Peat and Other Organic Soils. 2014.

ASTM D422-63. Standard Test Method for Particle Size-Analysis of Soils. 2007.

ASTM D698. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristic of Soil Using Standard Effort. 2012.

ASTM D854-05. Standard Test Method for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer. 2014

BS 1377: Part 3: Clause 5. Sulphate Content of Soil and Groundwater. 1990.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), “AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures” (1993).

Abhishek, A. Pandit and H. Sood, “Analysis of Rigid Pavement Joints under Different Shoulder Types”, International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), Volume 10 Issue IV Apr 2022.

Downloads

Published

01-05-2024

Similar Articles

1-10 of 156

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.