Evaluation of Bonding Adhesion Strength and Failure Modes of Different Types of Cutback Asphalts

Authors

  • Teeba Falih Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Alaa H. Abed Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29194/NJES.27020149

Keywords:

Pull-off Test, Tack Coat, Bonding Strength, Tensile Strength, Proceq DYNA Z16

Abstract

A tack coat is a minimal coating of asphalt cement, cut-back asphalt, or asphalt emulsion to an existing pavement surface between layers to guarantee proper bonding between the two layers and longitudinal and transverse joints. Numerous researchers have assessed interlayer adhesion employing failure-mode behavior tests, such as pull-off, direct shear, and torsion testing. This study aims to quantify the best tensile resistance obtained using three types of cutback asphalt (RC70, RC800 modified with polymer 4.5% & MC70). All are applied on concrete surfaces at a rate of 0.5 L/m². The Proceq DYNA Z16 pull–off tester is used to measure the tensile strength at a rate of 0.25 kN/s. It is found that the average tensile strength of the tack coat materials is (0.319, 0.138, 0.028) MPa, respectively. It is concluded that RC70 has the maximum tensile strength. Also, the different types of solvent affect adhesion strengths; RC70 was Prepared using gasoline, while MC70 used petroleum. Gasoline has greater volatility and thus increased adhesion. Failure strength modes of interior bonding varied between cohesive failure adhesive and adhesive failure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mohammad, L. N., Elseifi, M. A., Bae, A., Patel, N., Button, J., & Scherocman, J. A. (2012). Optimization of Tack Coat for HMA Placement, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 712. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academies, Washington, DC.

Huang, Yang Hsien. Pavement analysis and design. Vol. 2. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004‏.

Shahin, M. Y., Blackmon, E. W., Van Dam, T., Kirchner, K. (1987). “Consequence of Layer Separation on Pavement Performance.” Report No. DOT/FAA/PM-86/48. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C.

King, G. and R. May. (2003). New Approaches to Tack Application, Presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

Wang, J., F. Xiao, Z. Chen, X. Li and S. Amirkhanian. (2017). Application of tack coat in pavement engineering. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 152, pp. 856-871.

Biglari, M., Asgharzadeh, S. M., & Sharif Tehrani, S. (2019). Evaluation of factors affecting tack coat bond strength. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 46(6), 270–277.

Stanzl, S. E., Tschegg, E. K., & Mayer, H. (1986). Lifetime measurements for random loading in the very high cycle fatigue range. International Journal of Fatigue, 8(4), 195–200.

Hakimzadeh, S., Kebede, N. A., Buttlar, W. G., Ahmed, S., & Exline, M. (2012). Development of fracture-energy based interface bond test for asphalt concrete. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13(sup1), 76–87.

Tack Coat Materials and methods for optimaizing for thin HMA applications. (2011, May). Road Science, LCC..

Roffe, J.-C., & Chaignon, F. (2002). Characterization tests on bond coats: worldwide study, impact, tests, recommendations. proceedings of the 3rd international conference on bituminous mixtures and pavements, held thessaloniki, greece, november 2002., 1 (11) Tampanatu P.F. Sompie. Syanne Pangemanan (May 2018). Shear Strength of Tack Coat on Flexible Pavement and Composite Pavement. Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum Vol. 4 No. 2.

Hachiya, Y., Umeno, S., & Sato, K. (1997). Effect of tack coat on bonding characteristics at interface between asphalt concrete layers. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, 1997(571), 199–209.

Wood, T. J., Janisch, D. W., & Gaillard, F. S. (2006). Minnesota seal coat handbook 2006.

Chen, D.-H. (2010). Slippage failure of a new hot-mix asphalt overlay. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 24(3), 258,264.

Cross, S. A., & Shrestha, P. P. (2005). Guidelines for using prime and tack coats. United States. Federal Highway Administration Central Federal Lands Highway

West, R. C., Zhang, J., & Moore, J. (2005). Evaluation of bond strength between pavement layers. Auburn University. National Center for Asphalt Technology

Raab, C., & Partl, M. N. (2009). Evaluation of interlayer shear bond devices for asphalt pavements. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 4(4), 186–195

Haftprüfgerät, Pull-off Tester, proceq DYNA Z16 manual.

Raab, C., & Partl, M. N. (2004). Effect of tack coats on interlayer shear bond of pavements. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA’04), 12, 16.

Talha, S.K., Abu, M.S., August 2019, Civil Engineering. Laboratory and Field Characterization of Micro-surfacing Mix Bond Strength.

Downloads

Published

29-08-2024

How to Cite

[1]
T. Falih and A. H. Abed, “Evaluation of Bonding Adhesion Strength and Failure Modes of Different Types of Cutback Asphalts”, NJES, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 149–154, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.29194/NJES.27020149.

Similar Articles

171-180 of 221

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.