Vol. 20 No. 2 (2017) Cover Image
Vol. 20 No. 2 (2017)

Published: March 31, 2017

Pages: 436-445

Articles

The Strategies of Architectural Design Resisting Earthquake in Tall Buildings

Abstract

The target of architecture is present buildings serve the requirements of the human both of aesthetic , functional and safety to serve the people needs , and design buildings could  resist the exterior envelopes that may effect on their work in perfect way , and one of the big risks of damage on buildings and people is " the earthquake " and with the scientific developments of buildings field specially the designing of tall buildings ,the architect should have strategies for seismic design for tall buildings. And with The need of founding aclear framework of the strategies of architecture design resistant to earthquake, especially in tall buildings .the research aim to found these strategies by the identification of the  main load applied on the tall building structure and the best solution of structure design that serve the resistance of  lateral load , then search for the best of configuration for seismic design. Also  define the " Damping systems in tall buildings " and clarify the main types and the advantages and disadvantages of each one . Finally discuss the design considerations of using damping systems which found in the research samples .

References

  1. G G Schierle, PhD, FAIA, Structures in Architecture, University of Southern California, 2006.
  2. Designing for Earthquakes, Risk Management Series, A Manual for Architects, Providing Protection to People and Buildings, FEMA 454 / December 2006.
  3. Andrew Charleson, Seismic Design for Architects, Architectural Press is an imprint of Elsevier Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP, UK, First edition 2008.
  4. European Committee for Standardization (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance – Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (BS EN 1998–1:2004).
  5. American Institute of Civil Engineers (2006). Minimum Design Forces for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-05). American Institute of Civil Engineers. This code satisfies the seismic design requirements of the International Building Code 2006 (IBC 2006), published by International Code Council, Inc.
  6. H. E. Ilgin and M. H. Gunel, “The Role of Aerodynamic Modifications in 2007/2 (24:2), pp. 17-25.
  7. Binh K. Nguyen and Hasim Altan, Strategies to Reduce Lateral Forces on High-rise Buildings that Use Diagrid Structural System, School of Architecture, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  8. M. M. Ali and K. S. Moon, “Structural Developments in Tall Buildings: Current Trends and Future Prospects”, Architectural Science Review, Vol. 50.3, 2007, pp. 205-223.
  9. R. J. Smith and M. R. Willford, “The Damped Outrigger Concept of Tall Building”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 16, 2007, pp. 501-517.
  10. J. J. Connor, “Introduction to Structural Motion Control”, New York: Prentice Hall, 2003.
  11. Julius Marko, Influence of damping systems on building structure subject to seismic effects, May, 2006.
  12. Douglas P. Taylor, Mega Brace Seismic Dampers for the Torre Mayor Project at Mexico City, North Tonawanda, NY 14120-0748, http://www.taylordevices.eu/pdfs/Mega%20Brace%20Seismic%20Dampers-Taylor.pdf.
  13. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taipei_101
  14. http://www.archinomy.com/case-studies/671/taipei-101-a-case-study
  15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torre_Mayor
  16. https://www.wbdg.org/resources/seismic_design.php
  17. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Seismic Design Guidelines for Tall Buildings, October 2010.
  18. Kareem, A., Kijewski, T., & Tamura, Y. (1999). Mitigation of motions of tall buildings with specific examples of recent applications. Wind and Structures, 2(3), 201–251.
  19. Alberto Lago, Dario Trabucco and Antony Wood, Damping Technologies for Tall Buildings: New Trends in Comfort and Safety, © 2016 Elsevier B.V.
  20. Lee, D., & Taylor, D. P. (2001). Viscous Damper Development and Future Trends. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 10(5 SPEC. ISS.), 311–320.
  21. Samali, B., & Kwok, K. C. S. (1995). Use of viscoelastic dampers in reducing wind- and earthquake-induced motion of building structures. Engineering Structures, 17(9), 639–654.
  22. Kaur, N., Matsagar, V. A., & Nagpal, A. K. (2012). Earthquake Response of Mid-rise to High-rise Buildings with Friction Dampers. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 1(4), 311–332.
  23. Tanaka, H., & Mak, C. Y. (1983). Effect of Tuned Mass Dampers on Wind Induced Response of Tall Buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 14, 357–368.
  24. Wakahara, T., Ohyama, T., & Fujii, K. (1992). Suppression of Wind-induced Vibration of a Tall Building using Tuned Liquid Damper. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 43(1-3), 1895–1906.
  25. Asai, T., Chang, C.-M., Phillips, B. M., & Spencer Jr., B. F. (2013). Real-Time Hybrid Simulation of a Smart Outrigger Damping System for High-Rise Buildings. Engineering Structures, 57, 177–188.
  26. Pant, D. R., Montgomery, M., & Baxter, R. P. (2015). Resilient Seismic Design of Tall Coupled Shear Wall Buildings using Viscoelastic Coupling Dampers. In The 11th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
  27. Bharti, S. D., Dumne, S. M., & Shrimali, M. K. (2010). Seismic Response Analysis of Adjacent Buildings Connected with MR Dampers. Engineering Structures, 32(8), 2122–2133.
  28. Fu, T. S. (2013). Double Skin Façades as Mass Dampers. In 2013 American Control Conference (ACC) (pp. 4742–4746). Washington, DC, USA.
  29. Kidokoro, R. (2008). Self Mass Damper (SMD): Seismic Control System Inspired by the Pendulum Movement of an Antique Clock. In The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
  30. Smith, R. J., & Willford, M. R. (2007). The Damped Outrigger Concept for Tall Buildings. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 16(4), 501–517.
  31. MacLeod, F. (2004). The latest developments in seismic mitigation of suspended ceiling systems. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Paper No. 3364, 13 pp.
  32. Arnold, C. (1991). The seismic response of non-structural elements in buildings. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 24:4, 306–316.