Vol. 20 No. 1 (2017) Cover Image
Vol. 20 No. 1 (2017)

Published: January 31, 2017

Pages: 27-35

Articles

Parametric Optimization of Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser Lap Welding of Stainless Steel ASTM A240/ 316L with Carbon Steel ASTM A570/Gr30

Abstract

This work describes seam welding process using dissimilar ferrous metals by pulsed Nd:YAG. The main objective of this work is to achieve the best welding conditions. This imposes careful selection for the welding parameters and inevitably the well design of experiment (DOE). Sheets of ASTM A240/316L stainless steel to ASTM A570/Gr30 carbon steel all of 0.5 mm in thickness were lap welded. Different pulse energies or the related peak power, pulse duration, pulse repetition rate, and welding speeds were used. Moreover, different welding speeds were controlled by the employed manipulator. The laser beam spot diameter and the standoff distance were fixed. Experimental results are supported by the computational 2D and 3D models. In this article response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to design the experiment and obtain the best parameters through a set of mathematical models that define the weld characteristics. The results show that the best joint in term of joint strength is obtained at 31.9 J pulse energy (related to 5.5 kW peak power and 5.8 ms pulse duration), power density of 1.43×106 W/cm2, 1.5 Hz pulse repetition rate, and 0.5 mm/s welding speed.

References

  1. Tzeng Y. F., Parametric analysis of the pulsed Nd:YAG laser seam welding process, 2000, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 102.
  2. M J Torkamany, M J Hamedi, F Malek and J Sabbaghzadeh, The effect of process parameters on keyhole welding with a 400W Nd:YAG pulsed laser, 2006, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 (2006) 4563–4567.
  3. Jerzy Dworak, Impact of laser beam shape on YAG pulsed laser welding, 2012, Biuletyn Instytutu Spawalnictwa, Instytut Spawalnictwa, Welding Technologies Department.
  4. Tadamalle, A.P., Reddy, Y.P., Ramjee, E., Influence of laser welding process parameters on weld pool geometry and duty cycle, 2013, Advances in Production Engineering & Management, Volume 8, Number 1, pp 52–60.
  5. Ugur Caligulu, Mustafa Taskin, Haluk Kejanli, Ayhan Orhan, Interface characterization of CO2 laser welded austenitic stainless steel and low carbon steel couple, 2012, Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, Vol. 64 Iss 4 pp. 196 – 207.
  6. M.J. Torkamany, J. Sabbaghzadeh, M.J. Hamedi, Effect of laser welding mode on the microstructure and mechanical performance of dissimilar laser spot welds between low carbon and austenitic stainless steels, 2011, Materials and Design 34, 666–672.
  7. J. Sabbaghzadeh, M.J. Hamedi, F. Malek Ghaini, M.J. Torkamany, Effect of Process Parameters on the Melting Ratio in Overlap Pulsed Laser Welding, 2008, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 340- Volume 39B.
  8. Y-F. Tzeng, Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser Seam Welding of Zinc-Coated Steel, 1999, Welding Research Supplement, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taiwan.
  9. Arat Y, Dynamic behavior of laser welding plasma, 1986, Electron and Laser Beam Technology Development and Use in Material Processing, American Society for Materials, pp 397–406.
  10. Dumord E, Jouvard J and Grevey D, Modeling of deep penetration laser welding: Application to the CW Nd:YAG laser welding of X5Cr center dot Ni center dot 18-10, 1999, Laser Eng., 9, 1-21.
  11. H. Long, D. Gery, A. Carlier, P.G. Maropoulos, Prediction of welding distortion in butt joint of thin plates, 2009, Materials and Design 30, 4126–4135.
  12. A. Ruggiero, L.Tricarico, A.G.Olabi, K.Y.Benyounis, Weld-bead profile and costs optimization of the CO2 dissimilar laser welding process of low carbon steel and austenitic steel AISI316, 2011, Optics & Laser Technology, 43, 82–90.