Vol. 24 No. 1 (2021) Cover Image
Vol. 24 No. 1 (2021)

Published: July 31, 2021

Pages: 52-75

Articles

Seismic Evaluation and Retrofitting of an Existing Buildings-State of the Art

Haider Ali Abass 1 Husain Khalaf Jarallah 2
1 Mustansiriyah University
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Al-Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad.
History
  • Received: October 3, 2020
  • Revised: January 26, 2021
  • Accepted: March 31, 2021
  • Available Online: July 7, 2021
DOI

https://doi.org/10.29194/NJES.24010052

Abstract

In this study, previous researches were reviewed in relation to the seismic evaluation and retrofitting of an existing building. In recent years, a considerable number of researches has been undertaken to determine the performance of buildings during the seismic events. Performance based seismic design is a modern approach to earthquake resistant design of reinforcement concrete buildings. Performance based design of building structures requires rigorous non-linear static analysis. In general, nonlinear static analysis or pushover analysis was conducted as an efficient instrument for performance-based design. Pushover analysis came into practice after 1970 year.  During the seismic event, a nonlinear static analysis or pushover analysis is used to analyze building under gravity loads and monotonically increasing lateral forces. These building were evaluated until a target displacement reached. Pushover analysis provides a better understanding of buildings seismic performance, also it traces the progression of damage and failure of structural components of buildings. 

Keywords

References

  1. G. G. Deierlein, A. M. Reinhorn and M. Willford (2010), “Non-Linear Structural Analysis for Seismic Design, A guide for practicing engineer”, National Institute of Standards and Technology NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief No. 4, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  2. S. E. Abdel Raheem and T. Hayashikawa (2003), “Nonlinear behavior of cable-stayed bridges tower under level II earthquake ground motion”, International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges/Colloquium on Bridge Vibration, Kitami, Hokkaido, Japan.
  3. A. Mechaala, C.Benazouz, H. Zedira, and M. Benbouras (2018), “Evaluation of the displacement coefficient method for seismic demands assessment of structures”, 14th ASEC conference in Jordan 12-15 April 2018 Jordan University of Science &Technology.
  4. A. Bagchi (2001), “Evaluation of The Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Buildings”, Ph.D., dissertation to Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
  5. H. He, M. Cong, and Y. Lv (2013), “Earthquake Damage Assessment for RC Structures Based on Fuzzy Sets”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Article ID 254865.
  6. R. Dumaru (2018), “Seismic Performance Assessment and Strengthening Techniques for Existing Reinforced Concrete in Nepal”, Ph.D., dissertation to the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, Portuguese public.
  7. A. Biddah, A. Ghobarah and H. ABOU-ELFATH (2000), “Response Based Damage Assessment of Structures”, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28, 79-104.
  8. A. Ghobarah (2004), “On drift limits associated with different damage levels”, M.Sc., thesis submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  9. E. Erduran and, A. Yakut (2004), “Drift Based Damage Functions for Components of RC Structures”, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
  10. M. Seckin (1981), “Hysteretic behavior of cast-in-place exterior beam-column sub-assembles”, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Toronto, 266 pp, Canada.
  11. S.Okamoto, S. Shiomi and K. Yamabe, (1976), “Earthquake Resistance of Prestressed Concrete Structures”, Proceedings, Annual Convention, pp. 647-665.
  12. B. P. Sinha, K. H. Gerstle, and G. T. Leonard (1964), “Stress-Strain Relations for Concrete under Cyclic Loading”, ACI Journal, Proceedings, Vol.61, No.2, pp. 195-212.
  13. P. Fajfar, T. Vidic and M. Fischinger (1992), "On energy demand and supply in SDOF systems, “Nonlinear seismic analysis and design of reinforced concrete buildings”, pp 41-62.
  14. G. Manfredi (2001), “Evaluation of seismic energy demand”, Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn. : 30:485–499.
  15. H. Park and T. Eom (2004), “Energy dissipation capacity of flexure-dominated RC members”, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, Paper No. 3481.
  16. C. Negulescu and, K. K. Wijesundara (2019), “Energy-based seismic design: Needs of Energy Damage Index Values for Serviceability and the Ultimate Limit States for Gravity Design Buildings?” 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering At: Crete, Greece, DOI:10.7712/120119.7079.19379.
  17. B. Yön, E. Sayın and O. Onat (2017), “Earthquakes and Structural Damages”, Earthquakes - Tectonics, Hazard and Risk Mitigation, DOI: 10.5772/65425.
  18. Applied Technology Council, 1996, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings”, Report No. SSC 9601: ATC-40, Vol.1, Redwood City, California.
  19. Fajfar. A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthquake Spectra . 2000, Vol. 16(3), pp. 573-592.
  20. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997, “NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings”, FEMA-273”, Washington, D.C.
  21. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000, “Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings”, FEMA-356, Washington, D.C.
  22. ATC, Applied Technology Council. “Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures”, FEMA440 Report. Redwood City, CA, 2005.
  23. ASCE, Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures and commentary. ASCE standard no.004-98, American Society of Civil Engineering, 2000.
  24. CEN (2005a), EN 1998-3 Eurocode 8; “Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings”, European Committee for standardization.
  25. The Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association (JBDPA), “Standard for Seismic Evaluation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings” (JBDPA, Tokyo, 2001).
  26. NZS1170.5. “Structural Design Actions Part 5: Earthquake Actions – New Zealand”, Standards New Zealand, 2004.
  27. Seismic evaluation and strengthening of existing reinforced concrete building - Guidelines, IS 15988 (2013), Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  28. B. Mahaylov, and L. Petrini (2006), “Analysis of Code Procedures for Seismic Assessment of Existing Buildings: ITALIAN Seismic Code, EC8, ATC-40, FEMA356, FEMA440”, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Pavia, Italy.
  29. Italian Ministry of Public Works, Ministry Decree. 14/01/2008. Technical Regulations for Constructions; Suppl. Ord. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 29, 4/02/2008; Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato: Rome, Italy, 2008. (In Italian).
  30. A. Moshref, S. M. Moghaddasi and Tehranizadeh, M. (2011), “Comparison of Different Non-Linear Static Analysis Used for Seismic Assessment of Existing Buildings”, COMPDYN 2011 III ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Greece.
  31. New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) (2002), “The Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Earthquake Risk Buildings”, NZSEE 2002, Draft Prepared for the NZ Building Industry Authority
  32. H. Alwashali, and M. Maeda (2012), “Study of Low-Rise RC Buildings with Relatively High Seismic Damaged by Great East JAPAN Earthquakes 2011”, Conference: Proceedings of Japan Concrete Institute at Japan Volume: Vol 34, No.2, pp.1147-1152.
  33. C. Xiaoguang, B. Jingshan, S. Youwei, and Z. Jianyi (2012), “Comparison of Seismic Fortification Criterion of Eight Asian Countries”, 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering At Lisbon, Portugal 2012.
  34. Earthquake resistant design for buildings (2001). Japan, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 82-102.
  35. Criteria for earthquake design of structures -Part 1 general provisions and buildings (2001). India, IS 1893-2002 Indian standard, 1-35.
  36. Specification for structures to be built in disaster areas (1998). Turkey, Ministry of public works and settlement, 1-32.
  37. Seismic Design of Buildings application and analysis (GB 50011-2010) (Chinese Edition) Paperback – January 1, 2000
  38. Building code for structural regulations (1988). Korea, Ministry of construction and transportation, 1-18.
  39. NBC105 Nepal national building code, Seismic design of buildings in Nepal (1995). Nepal, Ministry of housing and physical planning, 1-31.
  40. SNI-02-1726-2002, Seismic resistance design standard for buildings (2002). Indonesia, Ministry of public work, 1-25.
  41. Iranian code for seismic resistant design of buildings (1988). Iran, Building and housing research center, 1-49.
  42. M. Araújo, J. M. Castro, X. Romão and R. Delgado (2012), “Comparative Study of the European and American Seismic Safety Assessment Procedures for Existing Steel Buildings”, 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering At Lisbon, Portugal 2012.
  43. R. A. Hakim, M. S. Alama and S. A. Ashour (2014), “Seismic Assessment of RC Building According to ATC 40, FEMA356 and FEMA 440”, Arab J Sci Eng (2014) 39:7691–7699 DOI 10.1007/s13369-014-1395-x
  44. The Saudi Building Code 301 Structural Loading and Forces, the Saudi Code National Building Committee (2007).
  45. O. Cavdar, and, A. Bayraktar (2013) , “Pushover and nonlinear time history analysis evaluation of an RC building collapsed during the Van (Turkey) earthquake on October 23, 2011”, Nat Hazards (2014) 70:657–673. DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0835-3.5.
  46. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement. Provisions for structures to be built in disaster areas. Ankara (Turkey); 2007.
  47. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement. Provisions for structures to be built in disaster areas. Ankara (Turkey); 1975.
  48. A. Kurniawandy and S. Nakazawa (2019), “Seismic performance evaluation of existing building using Seismic Index method”, MATEC Web of Conferences 276, 01015.
  49. R. Lewandowski and P. Wielentejczyk (2019), “Analysis of dynamic characteristics of viscoelastic frame structures”, Archive of Applied Mechanics, DOI: 10.1007/s00419-019-01602-4.
  50. P. Fajfar (2000), “A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Based Seismic Design”, Earthquake Spectra, 16:573-592.
  51. D.G. Lee, W.H. Choi, M.C. Cheong, and D.K. Kim, (2006), “Evaluation of Seismic Performance of Multistory Building Structures Based on the Equivalent Responses”, Engineering Structure, 28:837-856.
  52. G. D. Seneviratna, and H. Krawinkler (1997), “Evaluation of Inelastic MDOF Effects for Seismic Design”, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Standford University.
  53. S. A. Freeman (2004), “Review of the Development of the Capacity Spectrum Method”, ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, Paper No. 438, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 1-13.
  54. M. Al Telbani (2015), “Seismic Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Designed for Gravity Loads in Gaza Strip”, M.Sc., thesis submitted to Civil Engineering Department, The Islamic University – Gaza
  55. Y. Singh, H.K. Jarallah, and D. K. Paul, (2006), “Seismic evaluation of ward blocks GTP hospital”, Technical Report No. EQ: 2006-10, Department of Earthquake Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India. 69p.
  56. M. Ismaeil (2014), “Pushover Analysis of Existing 3 Stories RC Flat slab Building”, International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology (IJAST), ISSN: 2348-5426.
  57. H. K. Jarallah (2015), “Effect of Soil-Structure Interaction on Seismic Evaluation of Existing Building Frames Resting on Raft Foundation”, Basrah Journal for Engineering Sciences, vol. 15, no. 1.
  58. H. K. Jarallah, D. K. Paul and Y. Singh, (2020), “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofitting of an Existing Hospital Buildings”, Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, ISSN: 2520-0917, Vol. 24 No. 06.
  59. K. A. KORKMAZ, F. DEMİR, and M. SİVRİ (2007), “Earthquake Assessment of R/C Structures with Masonry Infill Walls”, International Journal of Science & Technology, Volume 2, No 2, 155-164.
  60. Computers and Structures, SAP2000 v12 Integrated finite element analysis and design of structure basic analysis reference manual, (2012).
  61. R. Goel, (2008), “Evaluation of current nonlinear static procedures for reinforced concrete buildings”, 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
  62. Y. Singh, P. Haldar and D. K. Paul (2012), “Effect of URM infill on the seismic vulnerability of Indian code designed RC frame buildings”, Earthq Eng & Eng Vib. 11: 233-241, Vol.11, No.2, DOI: 10.1007/s11803-012-0113-5.
  63. S. Y. Ahmed (2013), “Seismic Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Pushover Analysis”, Al-Rafidain Engineering, Vol.21 No.3.
  64. D. Sabu and, P. Pajgade (2012), “Seismic Evaluation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Building”, International Journal of Science & Technology, ISSN Online 2229-5518, PP.1408-1415.
  65. N. J. Babu, K. V. Balaji and S. S. GopalaRaju, (2012), “Pushover Analysis of Unsymmetrical Framed Structures on Sloping Ground”, International Journal of Civil, Structural, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering, ISSN 2249-6866 Vol. 2.
  66. ETABS plus Version 9.7.1, "Extended 3-D Analysis of Building Systems", Computer and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA
  67. H. R. Tamboli and U. N. Karadi (2012), “Seismic Analysis of RC Frame Structure with and without Masonry Infill Walls”, Indian Journal Of Natural Sciences (IJONS), ISSN: 0976 – 0997, Vol.3.
  68. K. Golghate (2013), “Pushover Analysis of 4 Storey’s Reinforced Concrete Building”, International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology (IJLTET), ISSN: 2278-621X, Vol. 2 Issue 3.
  69. N. Neethuand K. Saji, (2013), “Pushover Analysis of RC Building”, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), ISSN (Online): 2319-7064., Index Copernicus Value: 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438.
  70. M. Azaz (2015), “Pushover Analysis on G+10 Reinforced Concrete Structure for zone II and Zone III Ad Per IS 1893 (2002)”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), ISSN: 2395-0056, VOLUME: 02.
  71. D. M. Daniel and S. T. John (2016), “Pushover Analysis of RC Building”, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research (IJSR), ISSN 2229-5518, Vol. 7.
  72. S. Sangeetha and A. Sathyapyiya (2017), “Pushover analysis for seismic assessment of RC building”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), e-ISSN: 2395 -0056, Volume: 04.
  73. N. Ning, D. Yu, C. Zhang and S. Jiang, (2017), “Pushover Analysis on Infill Effects on the Failure Pattern of Reinforced Concrete Frames”, MDPI, Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 428; DOI: 10.3390/app7040428.
  74. O. Cavdar, A. Cavdar and E. Bayraktar (2017), “Earthquake Performance of Reinforced-Concrete Shear-Wall Structure Using Nonlinear Methods”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 32(1):04017122.
  75. S. A. Al-jassim and M. Husssain (2018), “Pushover Analysis of G+5 Reinforced Concrete Building in Basrah”, International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology (IJIET), ISSN: 2319-1058, Volume.
  76. D. Abhilash and M. Vijayanand (2019), “Pushover Analysis of a Multi-Storied Building in Two Different Zones”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, ISSN (Online): 2319-8753, Vol. 8.
  77. N. V. Ingale and L .G. Kalurkar, (2020), “Study the Effect of Push Over Analysis for G+15 Story R.C Structure with and without Zipper Frame using Sap-2000”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181, Vol. 9.
  78. R. Ayre (1938) “Interconnection of translational and torsional vibration in structures”, Bull Seism Soc Am 28:89–130.
  79. G. P. Cimellaro, A. M. Asce, T. Giovine and, D. G. Lopez (2014), “Bidirectional Pushover Analysis of Irregular Structures”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ©SCE, ISSN 0733-9445/04014059(13).
  80. M. Mohod (2015), “Pushover Analysis of Structures with Plan Irregularity”, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), -ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 12, Issue 4.
  81. P. Fajfar, Y. Marus and I. Perus, (2005b), “The extension of N2 method to asymmetric buildings”, Proceedings of the 4th European workshop on the seismic behavior of irregular and complex structures, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  82. A. Chopra and R. Goel (2004), “A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings”. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 33:903–927.
  83. M. ,Jianmeng, Z. Changhai and X. Lili, (2008), “An improved modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands of structures”, Earthq Eng & Eng Vib (2008) 7:25-31, Vol.7, No.1.
  84. M. Kreslin and P. Fajfar (2011) “The extended N2 method taking into account higher mode effects in elevation”, Journal of Earthquake Engg. Struct.Dyn, 40, 1571-1589.
  85. D. Menachery, and N. Manjula (2014), “Application of Extended N2 Method to Reinforced Concrete Frames with Asymmetric Setbacks", International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976, Volume 5, Issue 12, pp. 143-154.
  86. American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE 7-10) (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
  87. Turkey Building Earthquake Code 2018, Ankara, Turkey.
  88. M. Zameeruddin, , M. Saleemuddin, and K. Sangle, (2017), “Seismic Damage Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Structure using Non-linear Static Analyses”, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, ISSN 1226-7988,
  89. M. Inel, and H. B. Ozmen (2006), “Effects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings”, ELSEVIER, Engineering Structures 1494–1502.
  90. A. A. Eslami and H. R. Ronagh(2014), “Effect of elaborate plastic hinge definition on the pushover analysis of reinforced concrete buildings”, Ph.D., dissertation to, School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
  91. Y. Jadhavand and V. Patil (2017), “Effect of User Defined Plastic Hinges on Nonlinear Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Frame for Seismic”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), ISSN: 2395-0056, Volume: 04.
  92. A. L. LÓPEZ, A. ESPÍN and G. S. OLIVARES, (2017), “Seismic behavior of concrete structures depending on the model of plastic hinge”, VII Congreso Internacional de Estructuras de ACHE, A Coruña, Spain.
  93. “Manual on Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Multi-storeyed RC Buildings”, Sponsored by Department of Science and Technology Government of India
  94. G. Occhipinti, (2017), “Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing RC Buildings not designed to withstand earthquakes”, Ph.D., dissertation to Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Catania.
  95. C. Durucan, and M. Dicleli, (2010), “Analytical study on seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete buildings using steel braces with shear link”, Engineering Structures, vol. 32, pp. 2995-3010, 2010.
  96. H. Fahmi and F. Faraj “Seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete buildings”, Eng & Technology, Vol.19, No.1, 5-3-1998.
  97. S. Dhiman, N. Mohammed and I. Nazrul (2015), “Behavior of Multi-storey RCC Structure with Different Type of Bracing System (A Software Approach)”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), ISSN (Online) 2319-183X, Volume 4, PP.70-82.
  98. N. Bhojkar, and M. Bagade, (2015), “Seismic Evaluation of High-rise Structure by Using Steel Bracing System”, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), Vol.47 No.5
  99. Bentley, “OpenSTAAD V8i (SELECT series 4) Reference manual,” 2012. Available: http://www.bentley.com.
  100. M. Hyderuddin, M. Imran, and S. Mohsin(2016), “Retrofitting of Reinforced Concrete Frames using Steel Bracing”, IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development| Vol. 4, ISSN (online): 2321-0613.
  101. S. Basereh, P. Okumus, and S. Aaleti, (2020), “Seismic Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls to Ensure Reparability”, ASCE, Structures Congress.