Vol. 23 No. 3 (2020) Cover Image
Vol. 23 No. 3 (2020)

Published: November 30, 2020

Pages: 260-266

Articles

Performance Enhancement of Oil pipeline Monitoring for a Simulated Underwater Wireless Sensor Network

Waseem M. Jassim 1 Ammar E. Abdelkareem 1
1 Networks Eng. Dept., Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad-Iraq
History
  • Received: February 2, 2020
  • Revised: March 5, 2020
  • Accepted: August 14, 2020
  • Available Online: November 24, 2020
DOI

https://doi.org/10.29194/NJES.23030260

Abstract

In the last two decades, underwater acoustic sensor networks have begun to be used for commercial and non-commercial purposes. In this paper, the focus will be on improving the monitoring performance system of oil pipelines. Linear wireless sensor networks are a model of underwater applications for which many solutions have been developed through several research studies in previous years for data collection research. In underwater environments, there are certain inherent limitations, like large propagation delays, high error rate, limited bandwidth capacity, and communication with short-range. Many deployment algorithms and routing algorithms have been used in this field. In this work a new hierarchical network model proposed with improvement to Smart Redirect or Jump algorithm (SRJ). This improved algorithm is used in an underwater linear wireless sensor network for data transfer to reduce the complexity in routing algorithm for relay nodes which boost delay in communication.  This work is implemented using OMNeT++ and MATLAB based on their integration. The results obtained based on throughput, energy consumption, and end to the end delay.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Barbeau, S. Blouin, G. Cervera, J. Garcia-Alfaro, B. Hasannezhad, and E. Kranakis, “Simulation of Underwater Communications with Colored Noise Approximation and Mobility,” p. 6.
  2. G. Heredia, “Multi-Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Cooperative Fault Detection Employing Differential Global Positioning (DGPS), Inertial and Vision Sensors,” p. 15, 2009.
  3. Premalatha, J., and PM Joe Prathap. "A Survey on Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: Progresses, Applications, and Challenges." MATEC Web of Conferences, Taiwan, May, 2016.
  4. Faheem et al., “QoSRP: A Cross-layer QoS Channel-Aware Routing Protocol for the Internet of Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 21, p. 4762, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.3390/s19214762.
  5. N. Mohamed, I. Jawhar, J. Al-Jaroodi, and L. Zhang, “Sensor Network Architectures for Monitoring Underwater Pipelines,” Sensors, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 10738–10764, Nov. 2011.
  6. E. F. Farid, A. A. Mahmoud, and A. M. Bahaa-Eldin, “Adaptive Smart Redirect and Jump Algorithm (ASRJ) for Wireless Sensor Networks,” in 2015 Tenth International Conference on Computer Engineering & Systems (ICCES), Cairo, Egypt, 2015, pp. 247–252
  7. M. Z. Abbas, K. Abu Bakar, M. Ayaz Arshad, M. Tayyab, and M. H. Mohamed, “Scalable Nodes Deployment Algorithm for the Monitoring of Underwater Pipeline,” TELKOMNIKA, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 1183, Sep. 2016.
  8. M. S. Choi, W. Yaqiong, K. T. Kim, S. J. Yong, and H. Y. Youn, “A New Polling Protocol with Efficient Cluster Creation for WSN,” in 2010 IEEE/ACM Int’l Conference on Green Computing and Communications & Int'l Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, 2010, pp. 357–362.
  9. K. Almi’ani, A. Viglas, and L. Libman, “MobileElement Path Planning for Time-Constrained DataGathering in Wireless Sensor Networks,” in 201024th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2010, pp.
  10. P. N. E. S. Barbosa, N. M. White, and N. R. Harris,“Wireless Sensor Network for Localized Maritime Monitoring,” in 22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications- Workshops (aina workshops 2008), 2008, pp. 681.
  11. M. Zimmerling, W. Dargie, and J. Reason,“Localized power-aware routing in linear wireless sensor networks,” in CASEMANS, 2008.
  12. M. Zimmerling, “Energy-efficient routing in linear wireless sensor networks,” in Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems, 2007.
  13. Z. Guo, H. Luo, F. Hong, and P. Zhou, “GRE: Graded Residual Energy Based Lifetime Prolonging Algorithm for Pipeline Monitoring Sensor,” in 2008 Ninth International Conference on Parallel and Comp, vol. 8, no. 3, Nov. 2018, Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies, 2008, pp. 203–210.
  14. Z. Ahmed and K. Abu Bakar, “An Enhanced Underwater Linear Wireless Sensor Network Deployment Strategy for Data Collection,” Int J Innov
  15. 686.843–850.G. Tuna and R. Das, “Trade-off Analysis of Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks,” p. 7, 2017. tdma-based sensor networks Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications (Seoul, Korea) 5 pp.3278-84.
  16. Michailidis E T, Tuna G, Gezer G, Potirakis S M and Gulez K 2014 ANN-Based Control of a Multi-Boat Group for the Deployment of an Underwater Sensor Network International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 2014 786154.
  17. Stojanovic M and Preisig J 2009 Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization IEEE Communications Magazine 47(1) 84-9.
  18. Proakis J G 1995 Digital communications (3rd ed.) (New York: McGraw Hill).
  19. Urick R J 1983 Principles of Underwater Sound (Mcgraw-Hill).