Vol. 22 No. 3 (2019) Cover Image
Vol. 22 No. 3 (2019)

Published: October 31, 2019

Pages: 166-171

Articles

Comparison between Graded Crushed Gravel Filter and Textile Filter using Statistical Analysis

Abstract

Many researchers have applied several experiments and research studies by developing criteria's design of drainage to improve the drainage process, and to show that the filters plays an important role to improve and maintain the drainage system from being blocked due to siltation. There are several types of filters, including granular mineral materials and organic materials, the other filter that was used is made from a special fabric material such as paper, burlap, or special fabric textile material. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of textile filters, and if it is desirable and suitable for Iraqi soil using statistical analysis. This study was conducted in the laboratory using sand tank model and two types of filters (graded crushed gravel and textile) with two types of soil (sandy soil and loamy soil) to compare and evaluate the hydraulic performance and the efficiency of utilizing textile filter instead of graded crushed gravel filter in drainage systems using statistical analysis methods. These statistical analysis show that there was a good agreement between measured and theoretical values of entrance resistance when using the two filters in sandy soil. On the other hand, the results showed that there was a weak performance when textile filters in were used in heavy soil (loamy soil) due to the high value of root mean square error (RMSE) and low value of agreement index (d). The results of statistical analysis show that the textile filter is desirable and suitable for Iraqi soil especially for sandy soil due to low entrance resistance of flow compared to loamy soil.

References

  1. Harr, M.E. "Ground water and seepage," McGraw- Hill Book Company, Inc. Printed in the United States of America,1962.
  2. FAO., "Material for subsurface land drainage systems," Irrigation and Drainage paper No.60. perv .1. Food and Agriculture Organization of united Nation. Rome, 2005.
  3. Lyons T., Werenfels. L, Houston. L. "Filter envelopes ail tile drainage," University of California of Agric, California Agriculture, 1964.
  4. Rapp, E. and Riaz, M. "A comparison of some filter materials for corrugated plastic drains," Canadian Agricultural Engineering 17 (2): 106-109, 1975.
  5. Rimidis, A. and Drickx, w. "Evaluation of subsurface drainage performance in Lithuania" Agricultural Water Management, V( 59):15-31, 2003.
  6. Muhopadlhay B, Majumder. M, Barman. N. R., Roy. K. P and Mazumder A. "Verification of filter efficiency of horizontal roughing filter by weling's design criteria and artificial Neural Network," published by Copernicus Publication on behalf of the Delft University of Technology, 2009.
  7. La, M., Arora, V. K and Gupt, S. K., "Performance of geo-synthetic filter material as drain envelope in land reclamation in Havyana " Agricultural Engineering 49(4), 2012.
  8. Kumar, R., Bhakar S. R., and Singh P.K., "Evaluation of hydraulic characteristics and management strategies of subsurface drainage system in Indira Gandhi canal command", CIGR Journal, Agric, 15(2) :1-9, 2013.
  9. ILRI. "Proceeding of the international drainage workshop", International in situate for Land Reclamation and Improve, Wagening. No 25,1979.
  10. Luthin, N.J. and Haig A. "Some factors effecting flow into drain pipes," Hilgardia, 41 (10), 1972.
  11. Gratn-Lennoz, C.H. "Effected of envelopes on flow pattern near drain pipe," Journal of Irrigation Drainage Engineering 115(4): 626-641, 1989.
  12. Spiegel, M."Shaum's of Probability and Statistics," Academia International, McGraw-Hill, INC, 1998.
  13. Bakhiari, B., Ghahreman, N., Liaghat, M.A., and Hoogenboom, G. "Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration models for a semiarid environment using lysimeter measurement," J. Agr. Sci. Tech., Vol. 13:223-237, 2011.